Muzi.com News Gallery Library Forum Celebrity Movies Chinastar Regions Channels
Set Home|Subscribe|Premium Home|MyMuzi

Home | Most-viewed Story | Most-viewed Coverage | Region | People | Time | Events | Business | Sports | Showbiz | IT | Politics | Military | Society | Education | Life | Health
  Muzi.com : Muzi (English) : News
  Fallout of US-India nuke deal
Last updated: 2008-10-24


Fallout of US-India nuke deal
2008-10-24

Category
Nuclear Energy
Nations
India
Pakistan
Saudi Arabia
City
Islamabad
Category
Regions
Regions
Asia
Middle East
People
Asif Ali Zardari
Event
India-U.S.
China-Pakistan
Source
(Christian Science Monitor)

Washington - China's agreement to help Pakistan build two nuclear power plants is prompting warnings that the new US-India civilian nuclear deal is already pushing other countries to pursue their own nuclear relationships.

The concern among South Asia experts and nonproliferation advocates is that the American deal allowing India to pursue an expanded civilian nuclear program with limited safeguards is prompting other countries in a volatile region to seek a similar deal - something the US had said would not happen.

"You can't help but hear about China supplying Pakistan with nuclear power plants and see it as a reaction to the US-India deal," says Michael Krepon, a South Asia nuclear proliferation expert at the Henry L. Stimson Center in Washington. "Pakistan is desperate for energy, as is India, but there are lower-cost and shorter-timeline options for producing it, so there is something else going on here and in the Middle East."

That "something else" - whether a result of Iran pursuing a nuclear program it claims is peaceful or Saudi Arabia talking nuclear power with the US - is a regional scramble to counterbalance the nuclear plans of often untrusted neighbors. In the case of Pakistan, it's the pursuit of a counterweight to offset the expanding US-India strategic partnership - particularly in the nuclear realm - through a similar, though less ambitious, partnership with China.

Announcement of China's intentions to add two nuclear plants to the Chinese-built one Pakistan already has came during a visit by Pakistan's new president, Asif Ali Zardari, to Beijing last week.

Pakistan's foreign minister, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, told reporters after the visit that Chinese officials are sympathetic to Pakistan's concerns about the "discriminatory nature" of the US-India deal. He suggested China, Pakistan's longtime ally, was acting partly in the interest of a balance of power in South Asia.

US had claimed no nuclear raceStill, the announcement left many questions unanswered, regional analysts say, including how Pakistan would pay for the projects when it is in a deep economic crisis and seeking aid from the International Monetary Fund to avoid defaulting on billions of dollars in debt.

Mr. Zardari returned to Islamabad without the billions in loans he is believed to have sought from China, so speculation has arisen that the nuclear deal was something of a consolation prize. "It could be a political fig leaf, since Zardari didn't get the financial package he wanted, or China could be legitimately concerned about the US-India deal, it's hard to know," says Jon Wolfsthal, a nonproliferation expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

What is clear, he says, is that the US-India deal - which gives India, once a nuclear pariah for refusing to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, access to international nuclear technology and to fuel for nuclear power plants - is having an "I-want-some-too" impact. "The US-India deal makes it harder for the US to argue that countries like China shouldn't pursue nuclear trade with a country like Pakistan," Mr. Wolfsthal says.

As it pressed earlier this year for international approval of its pact with India from the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) - an assembly of countries that seeks to control proliferation of nuclear weapons by limiting export of nuclear fuel and materials - the US made the case that India had been a responsible steward of its nuclear materials and had earned special treatment.

US officials on various occasions have stressed that the deal would not open the door to a nuclear race in South Asia or anywhere else. In Delhi last month, US ambassador to India, David Mulford, responded to a journalist's query by saying that there was "no possibility" that China would seek a similar deal with Pakistan.

Of course, China might not seek approval from the NSG for its deal with Pakistan, some experts say. Instead, it might claim the deal is grandfathered under its earlier nuclear agreements with Pakistan. Another possibility: Having acquiesced as part of the NSG to the US-India deal, China might seek approval of its Pakistan deal to test how far the group would go in discriminating between countries.

India's nonreactionSome nonproliferation advocates worry that the China-Pakistan deal - and the international silence that has met the announcement so far - could suggest that determination to control nuclear proliferation is weakening.

"India's silence suggests, if anything, that they are smiling on this, so the question is, why?" says Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center in Washington. "One answer may be that they are more interested in trashing the international restrictions and the Nuclear Suppliers Group that limit them, than in denying Pakistan access to reactors."

Still, he says that does not explain why US officials and members of Congress who questioned the deal with India have remained mum.

The Stimson Center's Mr. Krepon says he would not expect India to "beat the drums on this" for a number of reasons. One, he says, is that India would expect the China-Pakistan deal to go to the NSG, and would anticipate the group putting tighter restrictions on Pakistan.

He adds that, contrary to the US-promoted notion, India "does not have a blemish-free record" on proliferation. But he says Pakistan's is "worse," with Exhibit A being the A.Q. Khan network of clandestine nuclear exports.

At the same time Krepon says India can hardly jump to the attack on a deal that comes on the heels of its own success with nuclear powers. "It's in India's interest to maintain its own freedom of action," he says. "They got a sweetheart deal."

Another explanation for India's silence has more to do with its vision of itself as a rising global power that is now playing on a different field from its traditional rival next door. "On one level," says CSIS's Wolfsthal, "the Indians are saying 'We're not going to respond to everything the Pakistanis do, we're playing at the big boys' table now.' "

 Nuclear Energy   India-U.S.  China-Pakistan 
  Profile News237GalleryLinks  
  Activists warn US lawmakers of uranium mining perils (2009-02-28)
  Clinton's first destination as secretary of State: rising Asia (2009-02-14)
  Disgraced Pakistan nuke scientist freed by court (2009-02-06)
  Russian gas cutoff energizes nuclear comeback (2009-01-16)
  French power company in hunt for Constellation (2008-12-03)
  EdF takes on Buffett with new Constellation bid (2008-12-03)
  NRG rejects Exelon's $6.1B buyout offer (2008-11-09)
  Election to benefit some industries, harm others (2008-11-02)
  Fallout of US-India nuke deal (2008-10-24)
  Utilities consolidation goes on: Exelon for NRG (2008-10-20)
  Warped facts in last presidential debate (2008-10-16)
  Where McCain, Obama stand on the issues (2008-10-13)
  US and Indian diplomats laud nuclear deal (2008-10-04)
  McCain sketches policy blueprint (2008-09-05)
  Key US lawmaker threatens to hold up India nuclear deal (2008-08-06)
  India moves a step closer to US nuclear pact (2008-08-01)
  Obama and McCain turn focus back to economy (2008-07-28)
  Hitachi, GE to develop smaller nuclear reactors (2008-07-23)
  Western governors discuss balancing energy, wildlife (2008-06-29)
  McCain calls for building 45 new nuclear reactors (2008-06-18)
  German cabinet agrees a raft of energy-saving laws (2008-06-18)
  Is Nuclear Power Viable? (2008-06-11)
  Study: $45 trillion needed to combat warming (2008-06-06)
  IAEA: Iran may be withholding info in nuke probe (2008-05-26)
  China, Russia criticize US missile defense plan (2008-05-23)
Related People
  • George W. Bush
  • Wen Jiabao
  • Condoleezza Rice
  • Li Zhaoxing
  • Dick Cheney
  • Hu Jintao
  • Related Events
  • U.S. Diplomacy
  • China Diplomacy
  • India-U.S.
  • India Diplomacy
  • Australia Diplomacy

  • Stories Coverages

    NewsGuide EventCityPeopleShowCompany 
     ENTSportsBIZEDULifeMilitaryPoliticsSocietyHealth 


    [2009 Tiger Woods Accident]: Police: Woods at fault in crash, will get citation (17:28 12/1)


    [2009 US Health Reform]: Tempers rise as Senate moves toward health vote (17:28 12/1)


    [111th Congress]: Tempers rise as Senate moves toward health vote (17:28 12/1)

    [Afghan Terror War]: Obama: 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan by summer (17:28 12/1)


    [2009 GM Bankruptcy]: GM CEO Henderson resigns after 8 turbulent months (17:28 12/1)


    [2009 White House Party-crasher]: Salahi denies being White House party-crasher (08:48 12/1)


    [Iran-U.K.]: Iran warns of tough action against British sailors (08:48 12/1)


    [2009 Dubai Debt Crisis]: Dubai: World lacks understanding of debt crisis (03:48 12/1)

    [2008 U.S. Recession]: Economic reports signal modest growth ahead (17:28 12/1)

    [Iran Nuclear Crisis]: Russia shifts stance on Iran, Ahmadinejad defiant (17:28 12/1)



    Muzi.com

    Muzi.com : About | Sitemap | Ads | Contact
    All Rights Reserved 1994-2006 - All rights reserved.