Muzi.com News Gallery Library Forum Celebrity Movies Chinastar Regions Channels
Set Home|Subscribe|Premium Home|MyMuzi

Home | Most-viewed Story | Most-viewed Coverage | Region | People | Time | Events | Business | Sports | Showbiz | IT | Politics | Military | Society | Education | Life | Health
  Muzi.com : Muzi (English) : News
  Court limits Merck monitoring in Vioxx case
Last updated: 2008-06-05


Court limits Merck monitoring in Vioxx case
2008-06-05

Event
U.S. Painkiller Crisis
Company
Merck & Co.
Drugs
Vioxx
Drugmaker Merck & Co. is not liable for the medical monitoring of Vioxx users not claiming injury, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

The 5-1 ruling by the state's highest court means a class-action lawsuit by people who used the once-popular painkiller will be dismissed. One justice did not participate.

The lawsuit was filed by Vioxx users who claim they have no immediate symptoms but that use of the drug gives them a greater risk of developing illness. So they want diagnostic testing to uncover any hidden or developing problems.

Because they aren't claiming they have an injury, they aren't eligible for the settlement Merck announced in November. Merck agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle thousands of U.S. personal injury lawsuits involving a heart attack, stroke or death. Some 45,000 eligible claimants had initiated enrollment as of March 31.

The high court said that since the Vioxx users in the case don't claim injury, they "cannot satisfy the definition of harm" in seeking medical monitoring under the state's Product Liability Act.

In dissent, Justice Virginia A. Long argued that the law encompassed a broad definition of harm, and includes the concept that an "increased risk of injury that creates a need for medical surveillance" is a recognizable harm.

Whitehouse Station-based Merck applauded the majority's decision, which reinstates a trial court ruling.

"The N.J. Supreme Court has made it clear that you cannot bring a medical monitoring claim unless you allege you were injured by a product. The plaintiffs in this suit sought to recover from Merck even though Vioxx has been off the market for almost four years and they do not claim that it ever injured them," Merck lawyer Ted Mayer said in a statement.

The company also maintained there is no medical science supporting the plaintiffs' position that they need to be monitored for cardiovascular conditions nearly four years later.

A message seeking comment from a lawyer for the plaintiffs was not immediately returned.

Merck pulled Vioxx from the market in September 2004 after its own study showed Vioxx doubles risk of heart attack or stroke.

Merck shares rose 23 cents to $38.20 in midday trading.

___

On the Net:

Court opinion: http://tinyurl.com/5w3okg

 U.S. Painkiller Crisis  
  Profile2 News135GalleryLinks  
  $894 million deal ends pain of Pfizer's lawsuits (2008-10-17)
  Court limits Merck monitoring in Vioxx case (2008-06-05)
  NJ, Texas courts scrap awards from Vioxx cases (2008-05-29)
  Merck agrees to $58M settlement over Vioxx ad claims (2008-05-20)
  Pfizer reaches deal with some Celebrex users: report (2008-05-02)
  Merck extends deadline for Vioxx settlement (2008-05-01)
  FDA deadlines may impact drug safety (2008-03-26)
  Merck says 44K sign for Vioxx settlement (2008-03-03)
  Merck to pay $4.85B Vioxx settlement (2007-11-09)
  Judge expects Vioxx stroke cases (2007-07-29)
  Ruling puts Texas Vioxx lawsuits on hold (2007-04-21)
  NJ jury orders Merck to pay $47.5 mln in Vioxx case (2007-03-12)
  Vioxx award cut to $7.75M (2006-12-21)
  FDA wants sterner pain reliever warnings (2006-12-19)
  Merck wins latest federal Vioxx trial (2006-12-13)
  Judge denies class status in Vioxx cases (2006-11-22)
  Merck, Schering-Plough shares climb (2006-10-20)
  Merck profit off; shares up on drug sales (2006-10-20)
  Vioxx suits surge to beat deadline (2006-09-30)
  Report: FDA needs to fix post-market drug safety (2006-09-22)
  Merck moves forward with Vioxx successor (2006-08-23)
  FDA, MIT to collaborate on drug safety (2006-08-18)
  Merck suffers 2 setbacks in Vioxx cases (2006-08-17)
  Merck not liable for man's health woes (2006-08-02)
  Painkillers may raise heart attack risk slightly (2006-08-02)
Related Events
  • American Markets

  • Stories Coverages

    NewsGuide EventCityPeopleShowCompany 
     ENTSportsBIZEDULifeMilitaryPoliticsSocietyHealth 


    [2009 NFL]: Colts win a close one, Saints roll to stay unbeaten (22:49 11/22)


    [111th Congress]: Analysis: Fed under fire as public anger mounts (22:49 11/22)


    [2008 U.S. Financial Rescue]: Analysis: Fed under fire as public anger mounts (22:49 11/22)

    [Sept 11 Terror Attack]: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views (22:49 11/22)

    [CIA Prison Scandal]: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views (22:49 11/22)


    [2009 US Health Reform]: Senate Democrats at odds over health care bill (22:49 11/22)

    [2005 Hurricane Katrina]: 59 and counting: Health care bill nears test vote (12:37 11/21)


    [2009 Swine Flu]: Experts say radical measures won't stop swine flu (08:24 11/19)


    [2008 EU Recession]: Europe's recovery will be 'gradual': OECD (08:24 11/19)

    [China-U.S.]: Obama meets Wen as China visit winds down (22:06 11/17)



    Muzi.com

    Muzi.com : About | Sitemap | Ads | Contact
    All Rights Reserved 1994-2006 - All rights reserved.